(This minimum balance feature is only present for purchases from a bank account, but purchasing from credit/debit will invoke a $9 international fee which is worse)Īdditionally, the redemption process takes 3-5 business days, so you could theoretically receive 5-8% of your bankroll per week, so long as you could play out all the games.Īdditionally, Chumba is also a sweepstakes casino, and I have sent out hundreds of letters which give $5 of credit. If you already have a lot, it doesn’t matter, but it does mean you need a minimum to receive the fullest bonus and you can’t cycle your ENTIRE account. I remember that I couldn’t buy the $300 when I had $600 on the account, but could when I had $1000. Buying a pack seems to require having a certain amount more on your account than the cost. There’s actually a fair bit of nuance too. It might be superstition, but I genuinely get the feeling that higher bet games are predatory. Part of the reason I made the thread was to see if anyone had better data that suggests it’s safe to play bigger bets. At this point, I rarely ever need to consult the table anymore for optimal play so I can do this in the background. The upside is that it can be multitasked with anything else. I’ve done 200/hour before and that should be closer to $16/hour. (315*1.03=324.45) So around $12 an hour playing at a pace of around 150 games/hour. I’d say it takes around 2 hours casually to churn through the $315. It’s possible for it to be variance, but I’ve never seen the % dip below 102 at any point, and I have personally noted both win and loss streaks during play.

Regardless, it pays better than it should, at least within the given sample of 5000 games, but I’ve only recorded a sample that large at $1 bets.

Perhaps the fact that a push still counts in your favor as you are turning $1 of play money into $1 redeemable helps? There’s no particular mechanic that should intrinsically make it positive, at least I don’t believe so. After 5000 games of results, my returns were actually 103% of all games played, meaning 108% of the money spent. I originally found this out because I assumed the game would have the traditional ~99.5% return that is expected of BJ, and I would leverage the fact that you receive a 5% bonus upon purchase to still come out ahead. I don’t know WHY it works, but I’m sharing that it does work when playing optimally at the $1 level.

There’s not a clear cause for it, but it’s stayed consistent over 5000 games.

Has anyone cashed out fom chumba casino